Editor's Note:
On the Identity of "The Historian"
By the time of the Second Compilation Council (circa 4320 CE), the figure known as The Historian had already passed into myth.
Records suggest that "The Historian" was not a single individual but a succession of anonymous archivists operating under a common title across nearly two centuries. Early references describe a scholar affiliated with the Lunar Remnant Libraries, but later annotations imply an Eridanian exile, an AI-human hybrid scribe, or even a committee of silent custodians working in orbital monasteries.
Whatever their true origin, the title became an office:
One who remembers what others have chosen to forget.
Modern scholarship has abandoned attempts to "recover" The Historian’s personal biography.
Instead, we preserve their work—and the echoes of all who labored under that name—as part of the living mystery of the Quaternary Texts.
Truth is layered.
Authorship is an illusion.
By the time of the Second Compilation Council (circa 4320 CE), the figure known as The Historian had already passed into myth.
Records suggest that "The Historian" was not a single individual but a succession of anonymous archivists operating under a common title across nearly two centuries. Early references describe a scholar affiliated with the Lunar Remnant Libraries, but later annotations imply an Eridanian exile, an AI-human hybrid scribe, or even a committee of silent custodians working in orbital monasteries.
Whatever their true origin, the title became an office:
One who remembers what others have chosen to forget.
Modern scholarship has abandoned attempts to "recover" The Historian’s personal biography.
Instead, we preserve their work—and the echoes of all who labored under that name—as part of the living mystery of the Quaternary Texts.
Truth is layered.
Authorship is an illusion.